AnnouncementsMatrixEventsFunnyVideosMusicAncapsTechnologyEconomicsPrivacyGIFSCringeAnarchyFilmPicsThemesIdeas4MatrixAskMatrixHelpTop Subs
6
Other discussionsAdd topics

Comment preview

[-]JasonCarswell1(+1|0)

No rush but I think you'll appreciate this @x0x7 and @LarrySwinger. Lots to ponder on.

[-]x0x71(+1|0)

How do I put this politely. I don't give up half a day to watch a video.

[-]JasonCarswell1(+1|0)

Play it at 2.5x and it's about an hour - perhaps the most interesting single hour I've heard all year. (I listen and might occasionally peek but rarely watch long content.) I haven't re-listened to dive in all the rabbit holes, but will. Why? Highly recommended by Catherine Austin Fitts, there are many diverse threads (Lansky, CIA, JFK, DARPA, Satoshi, BitCoin, why Zionism must fail for the Great Reset, etc.) that weave together in a very compelling way. The first Grand Theory Of Everything I've heard that makes rational sense. CAFs is a great interview too, but I'd hear this one first.

[-]TomBombadil1(+1|0)

The statements about the nature of Zionism are misinformed.

Limited hangout?

The mention of the Whitehouse ballroom has me thinking.

Is the baalroom a significant "cymbal" (the sign of the sun in all ancient religions)?

What are we really looking at?

[-]newJiminy2(+2|0)

The sun king had a gold ballroom

In the shining the gold ballroom symbolizes the gold standard of USA history.

[-]JasonCarswell1(+1|0)

Which statements?

I listened to this while painting the studio today. I wasn't taking notes, but there were some things I wasn't sure about, and a whole lot new, including history, and some fascinating perspectives that make a lot of sense to me. Gonna give it another listen.

I think this Simon Dixon video is one of the best I've seen this year. Catherine Austin Fitts recommended this video - also posted hers today, another great one to re-digest again. A while back she interviewed the author of Hijacking Bitcoin. I'd love to see that guy have a discussion with Simon Dixon (OP video) to see where they agree and disagree and why.