| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 |
I'm continuing off of the concept for a dream nation which @x0x7 started a while back. I cannot find the original thread. Basically: if you could setup your own nation, what tax policy would you instate?
There are ancaps here and there's questions about the morality of such a thing. This is a separate discussion. Understandably, almost every nation currently in existence will convince you that taxation is unethical. But good things can still come from taxation. This thread takes into account that people still have to compete with other governments and just takes a practical approach. Discussing fundamental morality is outside the scope of this thread.
I would fix income tax at 10%. There is no need for a tiered tax because higher earners will automatically pay more money in absolute terms. A tiered system robs people of motivation to work harder. This low, fixed rate creates upward mobility.
The focus is instead on capital gains and inheritance tax. The former is fixed at 50% on gains made from savings, investments, and homes. Inheritance tax is 100%. The idea being that during life, you benefit from what the State provides and have upward mobility, but after death, you give back to the community and don't favour your children, who likewise benefit from the state and can maintain their upward mobility. Every individual has the responsibility and opportunity to make a living for themselves, with aid from the State, but along with that comes the necessity of starting from scratch for each individual, at least in terms of capital. Moreover, in order to be truly finished here and move on to the next world, one must be ready to distance themselves from all attachments including those toward family. To the dying, everyone belonging to the state should be considered family equally. This should even be the case for the living, only then can people be a folk.
As you can see, spirituality is deeply intertwined with the state. By returning the sacred to people's daily lives, depression is combated. That is also the reason why the income tax is 10%, so that the State can be seen as the equivalent of a church. The integration with religion should also increase volition in paying taxes so as to combat evasion by its roots. It's the State's responsibility to keep people motivated to pay taxes by making them feel part of a greater whole, much like the National Socialist party was able to do.
This entire tax system is geared toward actually taxing the rich. Capital gains and inheritance taxes are much more effective at that. The burden is lifted off of the middle class while an unhealthy greed becomes pointless, because you only have until your death to spend your money. No more intergenerational wealth and power concentration in families.
Do you like this tax policy? How would you tax people instead? Discuss.
I guess I'll add mine from that thread. I still remember it. I am an ancap. But I'm an ancap as an idealist. We are a couple of leap frogs away from being able to have Ancapistan. So while taxation is unethical, an intermediate state would need taxes.
So my idea of one that would require less invasion of privacy and low distortion on the free market and less administrative overhead and fewer interactions with the state is the following.
It's just a land use tax. Different than a property tax because that considers the value of the property and requires documentation when land is improved and punishes improving land. It also sets up an opportunity to reject improvements. But not all land should be taxed the same. So what we do is tax based on the population density of the immediate area. The exact relationship could get complicated and maybe should get complicated. You'd have to toy with the exact correspondence. So it's area*rate, where rate is a function of the surrounding area's density.
Then taxes are something only landlords pay. And farmers. But the farmers won't be paying too much.
It's also maybe not unethical at all if the operator of the state was the orignial land owner. Then it's just a land rent and layered ownership. And it does that rent proportional to the estimated opportunity cost associated with just the land part of the property. It's not taxing you for having brought valuable equipment onto the land, or building something useful on it.
I think this is called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism (though I know about it only because some user on notabug was a huge fan, so not an expert)
Thanks for the link. Of course you don't need to be an export to simply link it. TIL.
What about gifting? Selling property for ridiculously low price?
That's tax evasion and is addressed by the integration of religion / spirituality into the system, or even the other way around: the State being part of a bigger, spiritual whole. People view it as their sacred duty to prepare for death properly by letting go of attachments and not partaking in favouritism. It's more of a collectivist society. People are more focused on the general welfare than on that of their family and close friends. The young are also raised horizontally by an entire community from which they also receive support and it's understood that people give back as well. There is no greater attachment to family compared to the people at large. If people do at large, it's seen as an essentially spiritual disease and people think of ways of increasing social cohesion again.
It's not a place for the greedy, favouritist or opportunist. Those should be made to not feel at home there.