In his defense, the entire point of a canary is that you don't talk about it. If it is there then it is there. If it is not there it is not there. That is the channel of communication.
Here's an explanation from Wikipedia: >A warrant canary is a method by which a communications service provider aims to implicitly inform its users that the provider has been served with a government subpoena despite legal prohibitions on revealing the existence of the subpoena. The warrant canary typically informs users that there has not been a court-issued subpoena as of a particular date. If the canary is not updated for the period specified by the host or if the warning is removed, users might assume the host has been served with such a subpoena. The intention is for a provider to passively warn users of the existence of a subpoena, albeit violating the spirit of a court order not to do so, while not violating the letter of the order. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantcanary The implication is that magnora7 (Saidit admin/owner) received a subpoena related to some users at some point.
This is b there is no subpoena if they wanted to shut the site down they would shut it down if there was a crime committed they would be issuing warrants and seizing the servers
This is b there is no subpoena if they wanted to shut the site down they would shut it down if there was a crime committed they would be issuing warrants and seizing the servers
Log in
Also, socks is a shill.
Lame.
And we don't need more identity confusion and chaos. However, it's useful to see how easy it is to severely fuck with people.
Fuck socks.
Fuck magnora7.
>A warrant canary is a method by which a communications service provider aims to implicitly inform its users that the provider has been served with a government subpoena despite legal prohibitions on revealing the existence of the subpoena. The warrant canary typically informs users that there has not been a court-issued subpoena as of a particular date. If the canary is not updated for the period specified by the host or if the warning is removed, users might assume the host has been served with such a subpoena. The intention is for a provider to passively warn users of the existence of a subpoena, albeit violating the spirit of a court order not to do so, while not violating the letter of the order.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantcanary
The implication is that magnora7 (Saidit admin/owner) received a subpoena related to some users at some point.