AnnouncementsFunnyVideosMusicAncapsTechnologyEconomicsPrivacyGIFSCringeAnarchyFilmPicsThemesIdeas4MatrixAskMatrixHelpTop Subs
3
Comment preview
[-]x0x7
1(+1|0)
I think they are more or less in the "No lives matter" camp and they side with small groups at the cost of the majority only so they can benefit the fewest people and sacrifice the most. All the better if their "support" for the small community doesn't actually help them either.
[-]JasonCarswell
1(+1|0)
Accurate.
Supporting small groups for distraction and division and those small groups aren't too expensive.
Similarly McDonald's has houses for sick kids. How many kids are actually sick enough? Not many - dozens, hundreds, maybe thousands. Everyone loves kids, so how can they lose? If McDonald's was truly charitable they'd have houses for sick elderly - easily in the millions. They do it to SEEM good, despite selling poison.
And then there's the eugenics depopulation agenda...