It went my many different names. It was for a while labeled Rosicrucianism and the and then a decision was made to create a commoner class and they relabled it Free Masonry.
I wouldn't label it gnosticism, but they claim gnosis. The gnostics believed Christ was an ideal man who never actually existed, but was instead to be emulated as a goal for spiritual perfection. Connecting to the Creator by emulating the Christos and attaining various stages of "gnosis" as the individual finds his spirit and the actual Trinity of body soul and spirit; the true "soul mate."
The ritualized levels of Masonry are created with the intention of allowing various spirit entities into the individual as a host. A somewhat different path to attaining "spirit."
Y in Jim?
newjiminY, "Y" is another unknown quantity. "X" is another.
Christ's body is symbolically the whY on the ❌ cross. Y, arms raised upward cymbalically. A cymbal is the son.
Anyway, the mystery religion goes back long before Mizriam became Egypt.. sounds like e-gYpt... E Ju-Ptah...
Jupiter? That can't be right? Y... it's all Greek to me.
Wait. I remember what I was going to say. We've endure the age of "Aquarius the water bearer of the gods." He was abducted and raped by Ju-Ptah... Um, I meant Zeus.
We should be cautious about what we allow into our bodies.
Rene Descartes created rosicrucianism. The royal society is the public face. Look at Descartes Cartesian coordinate system. You have the x y axis, a cross. X and Y represents Jesus as you said. Worshipping math? Or knowledge like gnosis?
Jiminy cricket represented Jesus in pinnochio, JC right? In the original book he's just called the talking cricket.
Regimini is a Latin word, means regimen. Regimini militantis ecclessiae was a papal bull approving the Jesuits. Lot of symbolism in Disney movies.
How about trinitarianism. Hinduism and Buddhism seem to be based on the number four. Or pagan religions with hundreds of different gods and goddesses.
It's good to keep things simple for these made up cults . But then what do the scribes write about? What do the priests preach about? They need stories, they need heroes, plural.
What about the mind body problem? I think that's why some feel compelled towards dualism. You don't want to believe the mind and body are one, because of conclusions. Like there being no afterlife which is scary.
A monist-materialist would simply believe that there is an objective reality of matter, and our thoughts are a product of matter.
A monist-idealist would believe that everything is a product of perception, or perhaps God's perception.
I don't know about "trinitarianism" but it either divides the material and spiritual (dualism), or it doesn't (monism.)
Monism means there is just one fundamental substance - mind OR matter.
Dualism means there are 2 fundamental, somehow separate substances - mind and matter. But this leads to contradictions, like how does one affect the other.
They had Arianism created by a guy named Arius. He said God created Jesus which is basically what it says in the Bible. He had a lot of supporters which other priests were jealous of. I think they made up the trinity as a kind of 2+2=5 kind of thing, doesn't make sense, contradicts earlier teachings, but if anyone disagrees with it they can be persecuted and their property taken. Arius was exiled and poisoned.
That happened a lot, disagreements over religion that don't really matter but used for divide and conquer and for maintaining power.
Also these days liberal academics in universities will be teaching this nonsense about dualism and other philosophical ideas.
They Aryans were also the hurrians, and they diverged into a number of related groups.
The brahmans in India are one such group.
Modern Aryans still live in modern Persia..
Relabeled Ayran..
Oops. Did I say Aryan? I meant to say Iran...
Right, some Aryans still live in Iran.
They generally don't intermix with the common people. Some find it strange that the aYatollah returned to Ayran after the CIA coup against president Mossadegh?
Linguistics is important but I do think they called it Arianism cuz of Arius. Then they called it trinitarianism cuz of that too, and it's kind of funny this guy who they branded as a heretic, his name is still in use today for our mainstream catholic system. That might be by design as the gnostic Jesuits are in charge. Like how they call it Catholicism to honor the cathars. I think the name Tom Bombadil came from the Bogomils too btw.
Yes obviously. Relying on links to other websites makes you forget how to think for yourself. Probably frustrating for bots here that want to know where info they need to scrub is too. If you don't believe me on Disney that's fine.
So do you want me to do a peer reviewed study with my original research. People discussed things and came to conclusions before the internet. With rhetoric or dialectics.
Log in
It's part of an ancient mystery religion.
The Hermaphroditic agenda for the "perfection of man." Allegedly making man in god's image, before Eve was removed from Adam (Aton, atom).
This is what is actually meant by "the perfection of man," and "perfecting that which the Creator left imperfect"
They don't openly discuss these details in the valleys. There's circles (of knowledge) within circles.
Their ultimate intention and goal was given to people, as if it was the origin story of humanitxy.
Gnosticism
It went my many different names. It was for a while labeled Rosicrucianism and the and then a decision was made to create a commoner class and they relabled it Free Masonry.
I wouldn't label it gnosticism, but they claim gnosis. The gnostics believed Christ was an ideal man who never actually existed, but was instead to be emulated as a goal for spiritual perfection. Connecting to the Creator by emulating the Christos and attaining various stages of "gnosis" as the individual finds his spirit and the actual Trinity of body soul and spirit; the true "soul mate."
The ritualized levels of Masonry are created with the intention of allowing various spirit entities into the individual as a host. A somewhat different path to attaining "spirit."
Y in Jim?
newjiminY, "Y" is another unknown quantity. "X" is another.
Christ's body is symbolically the whY on the ❌ cross. Y, arms raised upward cymbalically. A cymbal is the son.
Anyway, the mystery religion goes back long before Mizriam became Egypt.. sounds like e-gYpt... E Ju-Ptah...
Jupiter? That can't be right? Y... it's all Greek to me.
Wait. I remember what I was going to say. We've endure the age of "Aquarius the water bearer of the gods." He was abducted and raped by Ju-Ptah... Um, I meant Zeus.
We should be cautious about what we allow into our bodies.
Watch your corn hole.
Rene Descartes created rosicrucianism. The royal society is the public face. Look at Descartes Cartesian coordinate system. You have the x y axis, a cross. X and Y represents Jesus as you said. Worshipping math? Or knowledge like gnosis?
Jiminy cricket represented Jesus in pinnochio, JC right? In the original book he's just called the talking cricket.
Regimini is a Latin word, means regimen. Regimini militantis ecclessiae was a papal bull approving the Jesuits. Lot of symbolism in Disney movies.
Disney reality
The problem with dualism is it produces weird beliefs like gnosticism. Monism would prevent such confusion.
How about trinitarianism. Hinduism and Buddhism seem to be based on the number four. Or pagan religions with hundreds of different gods and goddesses.
It's good to keep things simple for these made up cults . But then what do the scribes write about? What do the priests preach about? They need stories, they need heroes, plural.
What about the mind body problem? I think that's why some feel compelled towards dualism. You don't want to believe the mind and body are one, because of conclusions. Like there being no afterlife which is scary.
A monist-materialist would simply believe that there is an objective reality of matter, and our thoughts are a product of matter.
A monist-idealist would believe that everything is a product of perception, or perhaps God's perception.
I don't know about "trinitarianism" but it either divides the material and spiritual (dualism), or it doesn't (monism.)
Monism means there is just one fundamental substance - mind OR matter.
Dualism means there are 2 fundamental, somehow separate substances - mind and matter. But this leads to contradictions, like how does one affect the other.
They had Arianism created by a guy named Arius. He said God created Jesus which is basically what it says in the Bible. He had a lot of supporters which other priests were jealous of. I think they made up the trinity as a kind of 2+2=5 kind of thing, doesn't make sense, contradicts earlier teachings, but if anyone disagrees with it they can be persecuted and their property taken. Arius was exiled and poisoned.
That happened a lot, disagreements over religion that don't really matter but used for divide and conquer and for maintaining power.
Also these days liberal academics in universities will be teaching this nonsense about dualism and other philosophical ideas.
They Aryans were also the hurrians, and they diverged into a number of related groups.
The brahmans in India are one such group.
Modern Aryans still live in modern Persia..
Relabeled Ayran..
Oops. Did I say Aryan? I meant to say Iran...
Right, some Aryans still live in Iran.
They generally don't intermix with the common people. Some find it strange that the aYatollah returned to Ayran after the CIA coup against president Mossadegh?
Mossad-egh?
It's all so con-fusing, right?
Linguistics is important but I do think they called it Arianism cuz of Arius. Then they called it trinitarianism cuz of that too, and it's kind of funny this guy who they branded as a heretic, his name is still in use today for our mainstream catholic system. That might be by design as the gnostic Jesuits are in charge. Like how they call it Catholicism to honor the cathars. I think the name Tom Bombadil came from the Bogomils too btw.
Disney
City of Dis. Logo is a picture of satans castle. 666 in the name.
Neuschwanstein is Satan's castle?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuschwanstein_Castle
Doesn't look like that, check paintings by hieronymous bosch
Source?
Everything here's my own research using logic and reason I don't do the source thing
Is there a tangible difference between that and making things up?
Yes obviously. Relying on links to other websites makes you forget how to think for yourself. Probably frustrating for bots here that want to know where info they need to scrub is too. If you don't believe me on Disney that's fine.
Evidence based conclusions, except without the evidence part?
So do you want me to do a peer reviewed study with my original research. People discussed things and came to conclusions before the internet. With rhetoric or dialectics.
How about a link to evidence of the devil's castle
Like I said Dis and 666
Something about a bot response
Are you ok?
[removed]