I'm not sure. On the one hand it would be wrong to force my views on everyone, and I don't delude myself to thinking I'm the most ethical person on earth. On the other, stopping endless wars, genocide, oppressive governments, nuclear weapons, child sex trafficking, torture, rape, and countless other evils might be worth forcing my will on others.
Not if your worldview included trying to develop and understand other views.
It would unify and give everyone a common ground to touch base with, before they go their own way. At present we couldn't be more divided with nothing in common.
Good point, but you would instantly loose everyone else's perspective. That's a lot of insight lost all at once, even at the cost of some you don't like or agree with.
You can push a button that makes everyone in the world share your worldview. Do you push the button?
It's a crudely basic premise for a silly thought experiment with meaningless debate. (Thus I downvoted it.)
you would instantly loose everyone else's perspective
No where in the OP premise does it say that. It doesn't say much. One way: Put your world view in an email and everyone shares it. Doesn't say anything about people getting amnesia, gaining or losing skills, ethics, morals, or anything else. They just share your worldview, whatever that may even mean.
Yes.
Why?
I'm not ridged about much (FOEPATCHISM, voluntaryism, agorism, autonomy), am willing to critically analyze anything - especially authority and tribalism, and then from my flawed limited worldview they can then peacefully branch out into whatever and wherever worldview they like.
Log in
No, people need to develop their own worldview, not get a worldview pushed on them. Diversity is strength.
Diversity can be a strength, a weakness, or both.
Both.
Bolth.
I'm not sure. On the one hand it would be wrong to force my views on everyone, and I don't delude myself to thinking I'm the most ethical person on earth. On the other, stopping endless wars, genocide, oppressive governments, nuclear weapons, child sex trafficking, torture, rape, and countless other evils might be worth forcing my will on others.
Also, they'd make better Star Wars, Star Trek, Marvel, etc. /s
I guess that'd take away free will. But we don't actually have it Anyway, just think we do.
https://youtu.be/urBpdyFCZmo
I'm waiting for the hivemind to tell me if I should or shouldn't.
The HiveMind Reset would be better than the Great Reset because everyone would be on the same page, not supremacists and goyim.
It's an instant cease to conflict. Whether or not it is sustainable, practical, or full of potential is another matter.
It's also fancy science fiction that could never happen - a silly question.
Applying the populist perspective, eh?
You'll never feel alone.
A city of millions is full of lonely people.
A city of lone wolves.
Maybe lone tigers.
Tone ligers.
The hivemind says I should push the button. Assuming my worldview is following the hivemind.
Recursive accountability
If you do, you would lose the opportunity to see others' perspectives.
Not if your worldview included trying to develop and understand other views.
It would unify and give everyone a common ground to touch base with, before they go their own way. At present we couldn't be more divided with nothing in common.
Good point, but you would instantly loose everyone else's perspective. That's a lot of insight lost all at once, even at the cost of some you don't like or agree with.
It's a crudely basic premise for a silly thought experiment with meaningless debate. (Thus I downvoted it.)
No where in the OP premise does it say that. It doesn't say much. One way: Put your world view in an email and everyone shares it. Doesn't say anything about people getting amnesia, gaining or losing skills, ethics, morals, or anything else. They just share your worldview, whatever that may even mean.
Not necessarily. The OP didn't say that.
The phrase "share your worldview" means they see only what you see. That is how I interpret it.
It's so ambiguous yet it does not pass as female.
Yes.
Why?
I'm not ridged about much (FOEPATCHISM, voluntaryism, agorism, autonomy), am willing to critically analyze anything - especially authority and tribalism, and then from my flawed limited worldview they can then peacefully branch out into whatever and wherever worldview they like.